The move is not the result
A trade can move 45 points in your favour and still lose money. That is not a paradox or a rare edge case; it is routine on short-hold futures positions where the market move is only a few times the round-turn cost. The chart tells you what the market did. Your statement tells you what you got.
Net = Gross − Commission per side × 2 × Contracts
Return on margin = Net ÷ (Margin per contract × Contracts)
Why commission dominates small moves
Commission is a fixed cost per contract per side, so it is proportional to the number of contracts and independent of the size of the move. That combination produces a simple and unforgiving rule: as the average move per trade shrinks, the fraction of it consumed by commission rises.
Expressed in ticks, the picture is immediate. If round-turn cost is one tick's worth of value, a system whose average winning trade is three ticks wide is paying out a third of its gross edge in fees. A system averaging thirty ticks is paying three percent. Same strategy logic, radically different economics.
This is why the tick value calculation matters before the backtest, not after. It converts a vague concern about costs into a specific hurdle the edge must clear.
Return on margin shows the leverage you actually took
Futures positions are collateralised rather than paid for, so the appropriate denominator for a percentage return is the margin posted, not the notional value. A 45-point move on a contract with a multiplier of 10 and margin of 4,000 per contract is 450 of gross profit against 4,000 of collateral, which is 11.25 percent before costs — on a move of roughly 1.4 percent in the underlying.
Reporting the result this way is not bragging about leverage; it is measuring it. The same ratio works in reverse, and the number that makes a modest move look impressive is the same number that makes a modest adverse move expensive.
Notional value is still worth looking at
Return on margin is the right measure of capital efficiency, but notional value is the right measure of exposure. A position with a small margin requirement relative to its notional value is a leveraged position, and the leverage is what turns a contained stop into a large loss if the market gaps through it.
Both figures are reported here because they answer different questions. Margin answers “how much capital did this tie up”; notional answers “how much market exposure did I take on”.
Reading your own trade history correctly
- Journal the net figure. Gross results belong in the research notebook, not the trading log. The log should reflect what the account did.
- Record commission separately. It is only visible as a drag if it is a distinct line rather than baked into the average. A monthly total of fees against a monthly net result is an uncomfortable and useful comparison.
- Note the tick value of every instrument you trade. It is the conversion factor between the chart and the account, and it changes per contract. A trade journal that records results in points rather than currency is only comparable within one instrument.
- Watch the ratio of gross to net on your best trades. If your winners are being taxed heavily, the problem is trade selection and holding time, not the commission schedule.
What this calculator deliberately leaves out
Slippage, financing and exchange fees other than the commission you enter are not modelled, because they depend on your broker, your order types and the market conditions at the moment of the fill. The way to include them is to enter the prices at which you were actually filled and the all-in fee your broker charges per side. The arithmetic stays the same; the inputs get more honest.